Self-taps are legal, and nothing holds one passive #100
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
bcox/tymbal#100
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
A slot pointed at itself -- a string's
bridge_taporreturn_tap, a board'sstrings_tap,strings_maskorinput_tap, any engine's input tap -- is a loop nothing holds passive. The passive-bridge branch's final review reported that a string bridged to its own slot and a board whose strings are its own slot both run to the rail, as aninput_tapself-tap already can onmain. A throwaway probe indsp/bridge_test.cc's bench measured the board fed its own send at R 1, kicked once with 0.1 and one unit of load, holding a peak of 0.00748 every second from 1 s to 10 s without decaying; the string bridged to itself at loss gain 0.9999 decayed to exact zero within a second.The editor's tooltips say a bridge between a string and a board is stable at any coupling and a slot pointed at itself is not. The question is where the refusal belongs: the editor, the format's reader, or the engine reading a self-tap as
kNoTap.See
docs/superpowers/ledgers/2026-09-23-passive-bridge-ledger.md, Follow-ups.